This paper forms a part of my doctoral thesis at Helsinki University, which provisional title is “Perspectives on travelling in literary and non-literary texts from the New Kingdom”. The purpose of my thesis is to examine perspectives on travelling during the New Kingdom as referred to in the texts from Deir el-Medina. Texts from other contexts are planned to be used to exemplify and strengthen the research results, but since most of the preserved non-literary texts from the New Kingdom were found at Deir el-Medina my thesis mainly belongs to the research field of this village. Using this material I intend to present a picture of the attitudes among the Egyptians towards the foreign, as these attitudes are to be found in the texts. In a broader context these attitudes can give an insight into the Egyptians relations to themselves, their families and the society they lived in. Further I intend to compare perspective of travelling as it is present in ancient Egyptian literary texts versus non-literary texts.
This corpus has been the object of the investigation in my Ph.D. project. The aim of my contribution to this congress will be to state the results gathered during the course of processing all the available data.
There is something I believe worthy of consideration: the area, where the artifacts originate from has undergone numerous vicissitudes. During the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century, it was excavated and turned over in search of undisclosed tombs. These activities and consequent displacements of detritus hindered findings from having any stratigraphic context. Consequently, a part from one single ostracon, that has been found in situ by the edge of the digging area, the corpus is marked out by an ‘erratic’ nature.
Another peculiarity is that these documents display a rich variety of textual types and figurative typologies. Out of practical necessity due to their abundance and wide-ranging disposition, I had to restrict my study to the textual pieces. More precisely, I directed my attention on the inscriptions that could be labeled as specifically administrative (i.e. topics like: names lists, registers, delivery of supplies, countermarks etc). Consequently, the other categories have been documented into a catalogue but do not enjoy any critical interpretation.
The prosopographic analysis allows accurate dating inside a homogeneous time window (1204-1190 b. C.) for 90% of the samples. This chronology is also verified by the explicit mention of a regnal year inside the body of some of the inscriptions. It can be inferred that if the over 100-year digging activity compromised the findings, it did not elicit the incorporation of material belonging to foreign areas.
Moreover, the paleographic similarities inside this corpus make it reasonable to assume that a single head-scribe and few other wordsmiths (complying with his ‘muster’ handwriting) might have been responsible for compiling it. This basic statement, in concert with archaeological confirmations, allows the researcher to impart that the ostraca originate from the same archive/office. This should not be intended as a metaphor, but as a physical place that, because of the dating of documents, can be connected, most likely, to king Siptah’s reign and was settled in the same area (defined in the digging log as “Areal A”) where the ostraca have been unearthed.
This point of view is reinforced by another aspect: the documents pertaining to the delivery of food or objects indicate a process of handing over what must have transpired directly in the Kings’ Valley, and not in the village of Deir el-Medine. The nature and peculiarity of those goods and the modality of their transmission echo favorably in accordance with this proposition.
If we put forth these considerations inside the bigger frame of the late 19th dynasty context, they appear to be very probable. A strengthening of bureaucratic practice marks, in fact, this period. This is evident in the economy of the inscriptions and finds a confirmation also in the preference granted to potsherds and limestone chips (instead of papyrus) for the administrative recording. In these conditions, assuming the presence of a structure that achieves the function of archive/office ‘on the field’ is a logical consequence.
Conclusively, we are dealing with a coherent corpus that shows A direct and indirect connection with the craftsmen’s work of cutting and decorating Pharaoh Siptah’s tomb. If the hypothesis is correct, we can proceed from this assumption that the findings, [object of my Ph.D. project] offer a complete documentation about its construction. These fragments are ostraca in full meaning, not brouillons, drafts.
Der Text, der sich aufgrund der Fundumstände sowie durch die Nennung des Vorstehers der Mannschaft Nachemmut (vi) in die Regierungszeit Ramses’ IV. datieren lässt, weist neben seinem singulären Inhalt eine grosse chronologische Tiefe auf. Genannt sind unter anderem die Gräber der Vorfahren Nachemmuts, das Grab Sennedjems (i) und das seines Sohnes Chons (ii), die beide in der Regierungszeit Ramses’ II. lebten.
Weiter ist dem Text zu entnehmen, dass sich im Grab des Chons mehrere Pyramidia befinden sowie auch im Grab des Sennedjem und dass von diesen Pyramidia eines Chons gehört.
Genau diese Situation, wie sie hier geschildert wird, scheint bis in die Neuzeit bestanden zu haben, wie die Fundumstände des Pyramidions des Chons (Turin, Museo Egizio. Inv. Cat. 1622) nahe legen, das gemäss Bruyère im Bereich der Grabanlage Sennedjems bzw. Chons’ (TT 1) gefunden wurde. Die Tatsache, dass aus Deir el-Medine zahlreiche, fast intakt erhaltene Pyramidia stammen, lässt in Verbindung mit dem Text auf O. KV 18/3.590 die Vermutung zu, dass diese intakten Pyramidia nicht von ihrer ursprünglichen Position in fünf bis sechs Metern Höhe zu Boden gestürzt sind – dabei wären sie mit grosser Wahrscheinlichkeit stärker beschädigt worden –, sondern dass sie heruntergenommen und anschliessend in verschiedenen Gräbern bzw. Grabschächten aufbewahrt wurden.
Die möglichen Gründe, die zu dieser bisher nicht nachgewiesenen Praktik geführt haben, sollen näher untersucht werden. Zudem wird versucht, die anderen Besitzer von Pyramidia sowie deren Gräber zu identifizieren.
Of particular interest is the practical functioning of the concept of the staff of old age, not as a sort of mode of pension and quasi-retirement, but as the direct overlap between the education of the son and his accession to office after the death of his father. In this respect I take history of the family of Amonnakhte son of Ipuy to be characteristic, in their succession to the post of scribe from the reign of Ramesses III through into the 21st Dynasty. This family was a large one, with several boys receiving scribal training, but unable to succeed to the office that passed from father to (first) son in direct succession, and not as part of a clear institutionalised cursus honorum. Reserves were also educated, trained, but not required. We are not in a position to say which, if any second and later sons found patronage and scribal employment outside the community.
These themes pose core questions for describing the social norms Egyptian society: the practical and cultural restrictions on a man whose father lived long, or who was a younger brother; the real nature of meritocracy, and the concept of the curriculum vitae and a career structure in the pattern of a cursus honorum; how people were trained; and what their life-expectations and ambitions were. This then gives focus to a number of the more intractable questions of ordinary Egyptology: whether people built their own tombs during their lives, or whether they were built by family after death; and if they were built during life, when did a person know to start building. Tombs do not seem to have be started early and gradually extended, but more typically to be built quite late in life, when people have reached high office. The issue is partly the question of what proportion of a person’s wealth went into his tomb. At Deir el Medina, the tomb of Kha gives a fairly strong impression that he really tried to take everything with him.
There is, than, a direct contradiction between the motif of the eldest son who succeeds to his father's (indivisible) office in the hierarchy, performs his cult in the role of his manifestation and continuation on earth, and receives the explicit transmission of endowed property – particularly tomb and temple property – through entail ‘from son to son, heir to heir’ without division in perpetuity. This contrasts to the role of the eldest son as leader of equals in the family, where ordinary inheritance of personal property was expected to be equally divided among all the children.
Die Göttin Qedeschet generell hat eine einmalige Entstehungs- und Entwicklungsge¬schichte. Sie ist weder eine rein syro-palästinensische, noch eine genuin ägyptische Göttin. Vielmehr ist sie aus wechselseitig im- und exportierten ikonographischen Elementen zwischen dem ägyptischen und vorderasiatischen Kulturraum entstanden. Ihr Name hingegen ist eindeutig semitischen Ursprungs, obgleich eine Göttin dieses Namens in Syrien-Palästina nicht belegt ist.
Auf nahezu allen Belegen wird die Göttin in ihrer üblichen Ikonographie gezeigt. Sie steht nackt und mit frontalem Gesicht und Körper ausgestaltet auf einem Löwen. Ihr Haupt ist in der Regel von einer Hathorenperücke bekrönt, auf die eine Krone aus Mondsichel und -scheibe gesetzt wurde. In ihren erhobenen Händen hält sie Schlangen und Blumen. In vier der sechs Beispielen wird sie innerhalb einer Triade mit den Göttern Min(-Amun) und Reschef gezeigt. Anhand dieser lokal eingeschränkten Materialgruppe sollen in meinem Vortrag nun einige Fragen gestellt und mögliche Antworten gegeben werden:
Wie stellt sich die Situation der Qedeschetverehrung in Deir el-Medina im allgemeinen dar? Wie sehen die Darstellungen der Göttin auf den einzelnen Stelen aus? Sind ähnliche Typen feststellbar? Wer ist der Stifter und was gibt es zu den Stiftern in Bezug auf ihre Stellung/ihren Beruf zu sagen? Wer ist außerdem auf der Stele zu sehen, z.B. aus der Familie oder von den Kollegen? Gibt es Verbindungen zwischen den Stiftern, und wenn ja, welche? In welchem Zeitfenster wurden die Stelen gestiftet? Und schließlich: Welches Fazit kann man ziehen: Könnte die Göttin Identität unter ihren Anhängern gestiftet haben? Könnte es demzufolge eine Art Kultgenossenschaft gegeben haben? Kann man in diesem Kontext von Persönlicher Frömmigkeit sprechen? Wie kann der „Sitz im Leben“ ausgesehen haben?
K. Lahn, Qedeschet – Genese einer Transfergottheit im ägyptischvorderasiatischen Raum, in: SAK 33, 2005, 201-237.
I. Cornelius, The Many Faces of the Goddess, The Iconography of the Syro-Palestinian Goddesses Anat, Astarte, Qedeshet, and Asherah c. 1500-1000 BCE, Fribourg 2004.
Deir el-Medina is the likely place of origin of currently known copies of the songs, while the scribes of that community are not always recognised as authors. Deir el-Medina provided also a substantial source base for analyses of Egyptian everyday life during the New Kingdom. Non-literary papyri and ostraca, being often legal and administrative documents show ancient Egyptian day-to-day dealings including family matters, marriages, quarrels and divorces. Authors studying the Deir el-Medina public, as well as private, life have usually made an extensive use of these texts, sometimes extrapolating their conclusions to all Egypt of that time, while overlooking the specificity of Deir el-Medina.
Material coming from Deir el-Medina and relevant for comparative studies of love songs in context comprises of three large groups.
1) the literary texts on ostraca and papyri the origin of which can be traced to Deir el-Medina.
2) the non-literary texts on papyri and ostraca originated in Deir el-Medina.
3) the figural ostraca from Deir el-Medina, tomb decorations from Deir el-Medina; As an exceptional source is usually added P. Turin 55 001.
The present paper suggests that most letters as well as administrative texts are not contrary to the world of the love songs; if anything, they are parallel though not dealing with identical situations.
Previous studies on rations have concentrated on the ration amounts given to the different classes of workmen. This paper takes things further by performing analyses on basic and additional rations (diw and dni respectively) during three core periods within the Ramesside period; the late 19th Dynasty covering the reigns of Ramesses II to Siptah, Year 25 of Ramesses III through to the middle of the reign of his successor Ramesses IV, and the late 20th Dynasty covering Ramesses IX - XI. Comparisons are then made, facilitating discussions on any changes in accounting techniques between these periods.
By detailed examination of the day, month and season of ration deliveries, it is possible to get some degree of conjecture of delivery patterns and importantly any absences, and then to ascertain when the payments were made. This in turn can foster investigation into any arrears of wages and the degree to which the system adjusted in the event of known non-payment of wages, as was the case during the strikes of Year 29 of Ramesses III. Coupled with exploring the possibility that ration delivery patterns were influenced by local festivals, we can speculate as to the reasons behind any delivery patterns.
The second part of this paper tackles the content of the material with detailed examination of the recipients and the amounts recorded. Two “master” ostraca from the 19th and 20th Dynasties are taken and form the basis of the analysis of the dated corpus in terms of who was recorded as receiving rations. This includes all workmen who are classified and named, the groups of non-specific men as well as those affiliated to the crew such as doorkeepers and women servants. The total of each delivery is then compared with an “ideal” wage list. In both exercises, differences in accounting techniques can be gleaned and suggested reasons put forward.
The latter published most of them in the ASAE and in several Rapport sur les fouilles de Deir el Médineh between 1948 and 1952. His publications include photographs of most of them and some drawings, but their quality is not always the same. The description and commentary for each one of the monuments are of great value, but at the same time quite unsystematic. After Bruyere’s work, several objects have received attention from various scholars, who have studied them from different points of view, for example, focussing on specific aspects of the social history or the religious practices of the village’s workmen.
Some of the Deir el-Medina stelae and other inscribed objects are kept in Cairo Museum inside showcases located in different rooms. Among them, a few fragmentary stelae are in display together with large figurative ostraca, and one is placed inside a vitrine mixed up with small stelae coming from the Delta. Others are stored in magazines, not only labelled as “New Kingdom” but also pertaining to the “Middle Kingdom” section.
Taken into account these circumstances, it was considered an appropriate and fruitful project to gather together all the material and publish a catalogue that will meet the expectations of scholars and will help current and future research on Deir el-Medina. Thus, a Spanish team directed by Dr. José M. Galán and based at the Spanish National Research Center in Madrid, started in 2001 a project together with the late Aadel Mahmoud, to collect the material, and one by one photograph, draw and study 69 stelae and other inscribed objects. Thanks to the collaboration of Dr. Mamdouh el-Damaty and the current director of the Cairo Museum, Dr. Wafaa el-Saddik, the project has been possible and is in its final stage.
Parallels between the two villages are obvious. The structure of the houses, typical finds and paintings and special constructions inside the homes are eyecatching. Even more interesting are findspots outside the enclosure walls. Small chapels, a special feature for those communities living apart from the main town and great temples surround both settlements. But actually striking are special facilities in the vicinity of the villages which can not be traced immediately. What is known from various texts and small notes which were preserved in Deir el-Medina can virtually be found as archaeological features next to the workmen’s village in Amarna: facilities for the provisioning of the workers and traces of guard posts and security devices. Further on specific characteristics in the cultic life of the workmen’s community of Deir el-Medina like the worship of the ancestors are retrieved in the village of Akhetaten although to a smaller extent. Family interactions, observed in Amarna, could not be raised in the short time the village was in use - just to name a few of numerous similarities.
Nevertheless the theory about the resettlement of the workmen’s community from Deir el-Medina to Amarna and their return after the Amarna Period lacks the final written proof and arguments against it have to be considered carefully. My speech will comprise a closer examination of the archaeological finds and the settlement structure of Deir el-Medina in the Amarna period. Compared with the village in Akhetaten it intends to reconstruct those dark years in the history of the workmen’s community and the previous and following events.
Das Phänomen Prestige wird als zwischenmenschliche Bewertung beschrieben, die aufgrund einer bestimmten, kulturell determinierten Wahrnehmung entsteht und durch soziale Muster geformt wird. Dabei wird Prestige nicht auf rein materielle Werte bezogen, sondern in einen gesellschaftlichen Zusammenhang gestellt, der das Wirken und die Bedeutung von Prestige durch Fallbeispiele für eine Gemeinschaft erkennbar macht, und den Prestigeanspruch verdeutlichen soll, den Personen innerhalb der Gemeinschaft von Deir el-Medine äußern konnten, um Prestige oder Ansehen unter ihren Mitmenschen zu erlangen und zu repräsentieren.
The majority of the objects of the National Museum’s collection were excavated during the season of 1934–1935 in the so-called Eastern Cemetery (including the so-called Children Cemetery), however identification of pieces coming from other excavation seasons and the Western Cemetery may be well established. The majority of objects date to the pre-Amarna 18th Dynasty.
A substantial part of the collection comes from the tomb of Sennefer (DM 1159), discovered in 1928. By the time when the set of objects came to the National Museum, the skeletal remains of Sennefer had already been in Prague, deposited in the Hrdlicka Museum of Man of the Faculty of Sciences of the Charles University in Prague as well as some early Third Intermediate Period mummies and parts of mummies originating from the graves at Deir el-Medina.
Although the collection has been in Prague for more than 70 years, it has never been published. The paper shall provide a general overview of the collection and highlight the key pieces it includes.
Recent archaeological studies related to the village have discussed for example social differentiation and gendered space using either the village and houses or the tombs as their main data. The private chapels, however, have not been a focus of any major study since Ann Bomann’s study (1991) focusing on the private chapels of Amarna which utilized the Deir el-Medina chapels as comparative material. The total number of chapels surviving to our days is around thirty and even though their condition is now rather poor it is firmly believed that a re-investigation, which is not solely “structure-orientated”, could reveal new aspects of these chapels together with the landscape in which they were built.
Approaches and methods adapted from studies in landscape archaeology can facilitate new appreciation of the chapels when surveyed in connection with elements from their surrounding natural and social environment. Proposed elements from natural environment include wadis, terraces and moreover mountains, which have a number of essential aspects such as elevation, shape and form as well as their connection to gods like Meretseger and Hathor. The social environment offers components from both private and royal spheres; the private ones are other chapels and tombs from Deir el-Medina and the latter comprise of the royal funerary monuments of the Theban West Bank in addition to known processional routes in the area.
Royal ancestor worship also seems to have played a very important role in the lives of the inhabitants of Deir el-Medina. Works have been written about the posthumous cults of specific royal figures, such as Amenhotep I and Ahmose-Nefertary, but a comprehensive work about royal ancestor worship in Deir el-Medina has never been produced. My dissertation attempts to focus on this form of ancestor worship at Deir el-Medina, by cataloguing some of the most important monuments from that village on which royal ancestors are represented. These monuments are divided into categories, based on the types of scenes represented on them, or the class of objects they belong to. Through these categorizations one attempts to achieve a better understanding of the nature of the relationship the inhabitants of Deir el-Medina had with their deified royal forefathers. This paper, however, focuses on one specific scene type that is frequently seen on Deir el-Medina monuments, and that is, representations of sequences of royal ancestors. What is the significance of these types of representations? When do they first appear at Deir el-Medina and why? What determines the choice of royal ancestors represented in such sequences? Are deified royal ancestors equal to the great gods? What caused the rise of royal ancestor worship during the New Kingdom and particularly at Deir el-Medina? These are all questions that this paper attempts to answer.
The worship of the royal ancestors dates to the very beginning of ancient Egyptian history, yet the form it took in earlier periods is different from that which it took in the New Kingdom. While New Kingdom reliefs depict the great procession of the Min Harvest Festival, in which statues of royal ancestors are carried before the king, and identified by name, the oldest form of royal ancestor worship did not distinguish between individual rulers, but rather, took the form of the worship of a collectivity. Each king became a part of this collectivity at his death. In the Turin King-list, for instance, we find a category designated “The Axw, followers of Horus”. This category refers to kings of the distant past. The worship of royal ancestors in the New Kingdom differed from this earlier form. Individual deceased royal figures were distinguished by image as well as by name and no site yielded more evidence for the veneration of the royal ancestors than Deir el-Medina.
Most of these stelae were erected by men, often singly, but more frequently with their sons than their wives. This may be because arranging for one’s son to continue in his father’s footsteps was an important male achievement in Ancient Egypt, but in this community it was not necessarily to be taken for granted (e.g. O CGC 25566, 25800). This paper will look at men and their sons associated on stelae to see whether any common factor unites such cases.
Whereas personal feasts were often celebrated with friends, stelae privilege family. This lecture will also highlight instances where stelae include people who are not family connections. For instance, the royal cult allowed men to enhance their professional status by being represented on stelae with the vizier (e.g BM stela 317.) The rich, childless scribe Ramose, who had no sons to share his monuments, erected a stela with his servant Sankhptah (Museum Schloss Hohentubingen, Inv. No. 1716), and another with his junior colleague Penbuy (Cairo JdE 21064).
As Gay Robins has shown (1994, 1997), decorum in Egyptian art gave precedence to men, and if a woman wanted to take first place on a stela, normally she had to appear without her husband. Nonetheless, there were various ways of highlighting women in a stela they shared with their husbands or sons, such as heading a register of ‘her own’ or being associated with a long text of her own. This research will investigate possible common ground between such cases, and also attempt to elucidate the rare cases of women who erected stelae in their own right, such as the stela (Turin Cat. 50053) erected by the well-attested mother-and-daughter pair of mourners Hemetnetjer and Iy (from their earnings?), or the stela erected by Heria (Turin Cat. 50050) featuring a prayer by a woman called Iyi to Queen Ahmes-Nefertari to deliver her from darkness by day. Could this be the Heria who stole the copper objects in O Nash 1 (Kitchen 2003: 243), and could her need to support a blind dependent have driven her to a career of crime?
The cult of the king – both deified kings and the cult of the royal ka – was very much a men’s sphere. Their wives were rarely represented on stelae in honour of divinised royalty (e.g. BM EA1347; Turin Cat 50037, 50041), and in all such cases Queen Ahmose Nefertari was worshipped, with her son or alone, maybe as a focus for the women’s devotions. On the other hand, the akh iqer stelae, which rarely represented worshippers, had a relatively large female proportion of female orants (e.g. Louvre Inv. E 16348; Turin Cat 50021(?)) maybe because the cult was often practiced at home. The stela Louvre Inv. E 16348 which depicts a widow and her mother making offerings to her late husband could in fact be related to a claim on a house (as in O Petrie 21 when someone set up a stela in a hut whose ownership was disputed) (Demarée 1982). Generally women lived in the village through marriage to one of the tomb building crew (Toivari-Viitala 2001: 5), and maybe after the man’s death they hoped that honouring his memory would reinforce their right of residence.
The offerings represented are often related to the orants’ status and gender; even though they may not necessarily have been offered in that way by those particular individuals, they refer to widespread attitudes about which items would have been appropriate for which persons. Meat offerings on braziers tend to be offered by the leading male worshipper (occasionally by women), long- necked vessels with liquids by women (never by men) and papyri and birds by secondary worshippers, who are often children. Exceptions to these trends may be significant and merit attention.
Robert J. Demarée, “Remove your Stela” (O. Petrie 21 = Hier.Ostr. 16,4), in: Robert J. Demarée and Jac. J. Janssen eds., Gleanings from Deir el-Medîna (Egyptologische Uitgaven 1), Leiden, 1982, 101-108.
Gay Robins, “Some Principles of Compositional Dominance and Gender Hierarchy in Egyptian Art,” JARCE 31 (1994), 33-40.
Gay Robins, “Women and Votive Stelae in the New Kingdom,” in: Jacke Phillips with Lanny Bell, Bruce B. William, James Hoch and Ronald J. Lephoron (eds.), Ancient Egypt, the Aegean and the Near East, Studies in Honour of Martha Rhoads Bell, vol. II, San Antonio, Texas, 1997, 445-454.
Kenneth A. Kitchen, Ramesside Inscriptions, Translated and Annotated: Translations, vol. IV, Oxford, 2003.
Jaana Toivari-Viitala, Women at Deir el-Medîna. A Study of the Status and Roles of the Female Inhabitants in the Workmen’s Community during the Ramesside period. Egyptologische Uitgaven XV, Leiden, 2001.